Nicole Speer; Michel Christy; vandalism of the Sacred Heart; Rooms are for people
Bruce Shaffer: Nicole Speer: She’s doing a good job
My family and I have suffered many impacts from the political decisions of Boulder City Council over our 45+ years in the city and county, and mostly for good. Now, after my career, every Tuesday I have the privilege of joining a dozen volunteers organized by Feet Forward to provide food, clothing and services to the homeless in Boulder. And every Tuesday, city council candidate Nicole Speer is with us, carrying equipment and supplies, serving food, sorting clothes, putting an arm around someone who is in pain and in need of compassion and contact. human. When it comes to the issues, the many good candidates are all quite smart and each pleads fairly well. What speaks to me is a candidate who recognizes the dignity of every human being and comes forward bringing their heart, soul, hard work and commitment to improving the lives of all. It’s Nicole Speer. Thank you for voting for her.
Jason Adams: Michael Christy: He takes the time to listen
Michael Christy is running for city council because he cares deeply about the community! It is that simple. The benefit to all of us as members of the Boulder community is that he is uniquely qualified to do this. I have had the opportunity and pleasure to get to know Michael and his family on a personal and professional level over the past few years. Michael’s time in the United States Navy as an attorney as well as his work as a family attorney and mediator will be immensely beneficial in negotiating solutions to the myriad of issues facing the Council. Michael does not view compromise as negative and it is important to have people willing to sit down with people and / or groups with opposing views. When Michael announced his candidacy and despite being a friend, I sent him a long email with a list of questions on topics that are important to me and my family. He answered these questions thoughtfully and succinctly, two things quite rare among most politicians! Michal listens to opposing points of view and searches for real, tangible and sensible solutions to problems. Our community would benefit greatly from the presence of MIchael Christy on the municipal council.
William B. DeOreo: Sacred Heart of Mary: Witness to the Crime
In the early hours of October 1, one or more vandals attacked the Church of the Sacred Heart of Mary and scrawled several blasphemous slogans on sidewalks, walls and even vehicles. They also tried to smash century-old stained-glass windows which are indeed irreplaceable. The reason was that they were offended that the church had placed 3,000 small crosses on the lawn representing the number of abortions performed in the United States each day. Abortion lovers can’t stand the light being shed on their beloved procedure.
The slogans were anarchists, saying that no God or rule can govern their behavior. They have been blasphemous in saying that Jesus loves abortion and they have been insolent in saying that no one has the right to tell a woman what to do with her body.
The crime of abortion is a crime that screams justice in heaven, and I fear the day will come when justice will be served in the United States and around the world.
They say you know you’ve gone over the mark when you start to get criticized. I would say that the Sacred Heart of Mary really showed the truth of this statement. Let’s face it, abortion is murder.
William B. DeOreo
Kimman Harmon: Rooms are for people: please vote no
Imagine that a family of four is looking for a house to rent. What if the Boulder ballot initiative to completely remove occupancy limits is passed?
Will they be billed by the room? And will four bedroom houses even exist after the initiative?
Rock rentals cost approximately $ 1,000 per occupant per month. (Three-bedroom homes rent for $ 3,000 per month.)
But this new initiative has no upper occupancy limit, beyond a trivial rule of 70 square feet per room. No need, because a 1,500 square foot house could be subdivided enough to accommodate 14 unrelated people, with 500 square feet remaining for a kitchen, bathroom, and living room.
Because the funders of the initiative (oddly) refused to include affordability requirements, the initiative will not achieve any affordability gain. But that will likely eliminate the last remaining rentals affordable for middle- and low-income families.
Using the $ 1,000 per occupant scale, this example home could potentially be rented for $ 14,000 per month. No family can afford it. And it is naïve to believe that the owner’s goals are volume discounts rather than maximum profits.
And who will regulate these rentals? For 22,000 locations, Boulder has precisely two overworked field agents who enforce part-time occupancy limits (based on their overall duties).
And there will be increased traffic on residential streets and “parking wars” from more people and cars. A 60 foot wide residential lot has only two parking spaces on the street and one in the driveway. If this initiative passes, overflow parking will eliminate spaces in front of neighbors’ houses, a sign of conflicts.
In addition, the three-inch sewer lines of typical single-family homes are not designed for guest rooms, apartment volumes.
Finally, virtually all college towns have occupancy limits like Boulder, for obvious reasons.
The name of this ill-conceived initiative should be Rooms are for profit, not rooms are for people. Please vote no. “